Skip to content

Gakido vulnerable to HTTP Header Injection (CRLF Injection)

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 25, 2026 in HappyHackingSpace/gakido • Updated Jan 29, 2026

Package

pip gakido (pip)

Affected versions

< 0.1.1

Patched versions

0.1.1

Description

A vulnerability was discovered in Gakido that allowed HTTP Header Injection through CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) sequences in user-supplied header values and names.

When making HTTP requests with user-controlled header values containing \r\n (CRLF), \n (LF), or \x00 (null byte) characters, an attacker could inject arbitrary HTTP headers into the request.

Impact

An attacker who can control header values passed to Gakido's Client.get(), Client.post(), or other request methods could:

  1. Inject arbitrary HTTP headers - Add malicious headers to requests
  2. HTTP Response Splitting - Potentially manipulate responses in certain proxy configurations
  3. Cache Poisoning - Inject headers that could poison intermediate caches
  4. Session Fixation - Inject session-related headers
  5. Bypass Security Controls - Inject headers that bypass server-side security checks

Proof of Concept

from gakido import Client

# Before fix: X-Injected header would be sent as a separate header
c = Client(impersonate="chrome_120")
r = c.get("https://httpbin.org/headers", headers={
    "User-Agent": "test\r\nX-Injected: pwned"
})

# The server would receive:
# User-Agent: test
# X-Injected: pwned

Affected Code

The vulnerability existed in the header processing logic where user-supplied headers were not sanitized before being sent in HTTP requests.

File: gakido/headers.py
Function: canonicalize_headers()

Fix

The fix adds a _sanitize_header() function that strips \r, \n, and \x00 characters from both header names and values before they are included in HTTP requests.

def _sanitize_header(name: str, value: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
    """
    Sanitize header name and value to prevent HTTP header injection (CRLF injection).
    Strips CR, LF, and null bytes from both name and value.
    """
    clean_name = name.replace("\r", "").replace("\n", "").replace("\x00", "")
    clean_value = value.replace("\r", "").replace("\n", "").replace("\x00", "")
    return clean_name, clean_value

References

@ahsentekd ahsentekd published to HappyHackingSpace/gakido Jan 25, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 26, 2026
Reviewed Jan 26, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jan 27, 2026
Last updated Jan 29, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(33rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')

The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-24489

GHSA ID

GHSA-gcgx-chcp-hxp9

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.