Skip to content

eml_parser has parser DoS via deeply nested parentheses in e-mail headers

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 15, 2026 in GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser • Updated Aug 25, 2026

Package

pip eml_parser (pip)

Affected versions

< 3.0.2

Patched versions

3.0.2

Description

Summary

eml_parser uses the email.utils.getaddresses() function from the CPython standard library to parse e-mail headers that contain e-mail addresses (such as To, Cc, Bcc, From, Reply-To, Sender, ...). When the input header contains a deeply nested CFWS (comment / folding white space) construct, the recursive descent parser in the standard library exhausts the call stack. The resulting RecursionError is not caught by eml_parser, so the exception propagates and aborts parsing of the whole message.

Impact

SOC pipelines use eml_parser to process untrusted e-mails. An attacker can easily create an eml file that will trigger the RecursionError during parsing.

The impact is mitigated by the fact that there are various other situations in which eml_parser will raise an exception when attempting to parse a malformed or pathological eml file. In particular, very deeply nested multipart e-mails also result in a RecursionError being raised by the library voluntarily. Therefore, systems relying on eml_parser already need to detect and handle errors emanating from the library in an appropriate way.

Workarounds

The issue can be avoided by wrapping the call to eml_parser.decode_email or eml_parser.decode_email_bytes in a try/except construct.

Patches

Since version 3.0.2, eml_parser will catch the error in the standard library parser and fall back to a simpler parser based on a regular expression.

References

@sim0nx sim0nx published to GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser Jun 15, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 25, 2026
Reviewed Aug 25, 2026
Last updated Aug 25, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(43rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

Excessively Deep Nesting

The code contains a callable or other code grouping in which the nesting / branching is too deep. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55619

GHSA ID

GHSA-m66c-fw79-6359

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.