Bump pycparser from 3.0 to 3.11

[dependabot]

Bumps pycparser from 3.0 to 3.11.

Release notes

Sourced from pycparser's releases.

release_v3.11

Enhanced C11 support

Full Changelog: eliben/pycparser@release_v3.01...release_v3.11

release_v3.01

What's Changed

• Drop an unneeded direct build depndency on wheel by @​hroncok in eliben/pycparser#597
• fix: handle integer suffix in #line directive without crashing by @​SAY-5 in eliben/pycparser#601
• Update default branch to main by @​myd7349 in eliben/pycparser#602
• fix: raise ParseError instead of AssertionError on unmatched '}' by @​patchwright in eliben/pycparser#604
• Add support for Python 3.15 by @​kytta in eliben/pycparser#605
• Fix empty compound literal (type){} raising ParseError by @​IMGillusion in eliben/pycparser#606
• Fix compound literal statements in C generator by @​Rayan-and-beyond in eliben/pycparser#607
• Keep the contents of adjacent u8 string literals by @​SashaMIT in eliben/pycparser#609

Full Changelog: eliben/pycparser@release_v3.00...release_v3.01

Commits

• ccb3439 Prepare for release 3.11
• 1d31981 Fix concatenation escapes
• dbcd5fd Add missing fake types
• 8bc38aa Fix dropped specifiers in lists
• 17da57c Fix generation of _Alignas and _Atomic
• 61f979c Add C11's fake headers and some tests
• dfbe88b Fix unicode escapes
• 74588ec Unify string literal parsing
• 7adecd5 Fix implementation of _Static_assert
• b7f48c8 C generation for _Generic
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.10%. Comparing base (7085285) to head (2088d42).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #14040   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.10%   99.10%           
=======================================
  Files         135      135           
  Lines       53551    53551           
  Branches     2809     2809           
=======================================
  Hits        53071    53071           
  Misses        362      362           
  Partials      118      118           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Autobahn	21.69% <ø> (ø)
CI-GHA	98.93% <ø> (ø)
OS-Linux	98.73% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-Windows	97.38% <ø> (ø)
OS-macOS	98.25% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.10	98.17% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.11	98.40% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.12	98.48% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.13	98.47% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.14	98.50% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.15	98.51% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.15t	97.90% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-pypy-3.12	96.57% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-macos	98.25% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-ubuntu	98.73% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-windows	97.38% <ø> (ø)
cython-coverage	83.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 50 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

• test_client_receive_large_websocket_compressed_messages[zlib_ng.zlib_ng]
• test_read_compressed_post_body[isal.isal_zlib]
• test_client_receive_large_websocket_compressed_messages[isal.isal_zlib]
• test_read_compressed_post_body[zlib_ng.zlib_ng]
• test_client_send_large_websocket_compressed_messages[zlib_ng.zlib_ng]
• test_get_request_with_251308_compressed_chunked_payload[isal.isal_zlib]
• test_one_thousand_round_trip_websocket_binary_messages[tcp-large]
• test_one_thousand_round_trip_websocket_binary_messages[tcp-small]
• test_ten_compressed_responses_iter_chunked_1mb[zlib_ng.zlib_ng]
• test_get_request_with_251308_compressed_chunked_payload[zlib_ng.zlib_ng]
• …and 40 more

✅ 102 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 83 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing dependabot/pip/pycparser-3.11 (2088d42) with master (7085285)²}

Footnotes

1. 83 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on master (8417f3f) during the generation of this report, so 7085285 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩